Derrick Favors and Rudy Gobert: An Elite NBA Frontcourt, Right Now

February 23rd, 2015 | by Clint Johnson

Mythological no more! With the trade of Enes Kanter, the Jazz formally unite Derrick Favors and Rudy Gobert as the Utah Kraken, now unleashed on the world. [Retrieved from]

The trade of Enes Kanter to the Oklahoma City Thunder for, in essence, a protected 1st round pick and 280 pounds of cap space is proving difficult for many Jazz fans to swallow.  That’s because they aren’t eating what the Jazz have served up on a silver platter.  Jazz fans everywhere should be feasting.

The Kanter trade isn’t about Enes Kanter.  It’s about Derrick Favors and Rudy Gobert, and the Jazz going all in on a frountcourt pairing that has become better than anticipated, faster than anticipated.  So much so that the Jazz must be wondering if they have been sitting on what will become the best combo of bigs in the league five years from now.

Skeptical?  A host of important numbers suggest they are a top five frontcourt already.

The following chart shows how Favors and Gobert compare to the league’s starting frontcourts in terms of production this season.  It’s true they generated these numbers largely from playing in separate lineups, adding uncertainty to just how their dynamic individual games will combine to form a consistent, high-minute pairing.  The duo have only shared court time for 335 minutes this season, which is far from a huge sample.  But the combined production in those minutes has been astonishing.

The Favors and Gobert frontcourt is an against-the-grain strategy in the modern NBA,1 a commitment to dominant defense through rim protection and offensive efficiency and diversity rather than specialized shooting.  Doubling down on the “big” in NBA big man.

A quick and dirty composite of NBA frontcourt duos2 shows that, judged by the standards of their own style, Favors and Gobert haven’t only produced beyond anticipation this season – they have very nearly pillaged the NBA.

Take a look.



The league’s frontcourts. Click to expand.

According to this diverse collection of metrics, the combined production of Favors and Gobert makes them the 4TH BEST FRONTCOURT IN THE LEAGUE on a per possession basis.  Yes, ranked just above the Memphis Grizzlies all-world duo of Zach Randolph and Marc Gasol and the Spurs veteran tandem of first ballot Hall of Famer Tim Duncan and Tiago Splitter.  Further down the rankings come the pairings of Dwight Howard and Josh Smith in Houston, Greg Monroe and Andre Drummond in Detroit, Kevin Love and Timofy Mozgov with Cleveland, Paul Gasol and Joakim Noah in Chicago, LaMarcus Aldridge and Robin Lopez in Portland, and Dirk Nowitzki and Tyson Chandler in Dallas.  In terms of simple production on the floor per possession, Favors and Gobert have played better than them all.

Not potentially, not in hopes of Jazz fans and fingers crossed in the future.  Right now.

Only three starting frontcourts have outperformed Favors and Gobert possession by possession this season. Chris Bosh and Hassan Don’t-Call-Me-Linsanity Whiteside.3  Physical freak DeAndre Jordan and MVP-caliber whiner Blake Griffin.4  And defensive tower Omer Asik and future Best Player on Planet Earth Anthony Davis.

That’s it.  Every other starting frontcourt falls short of the per possession production of Derrick Favors and Rudy Gobert.

The whole world, including Enes Kanter, knew it was only a matter of time before the Jazz tried to weld that production into a true on-court tandem.  But looking at the numbers, it’s plausible that Kanter’s public demand to be traded played less of a role in the team shipping him off than has been publicly reported.  Maybe the Jazz simply could no longer wait to commit to a pair of bigs who profile as title contending titans.

That is not excessive optimism; it’s plain description.

It all begins on defense, as it always will with the Favors/Gobert pairing – and the defense is frightening.  Gobert’s ridiculous 37.8% shooting allowed at the rim rightly gets lauded, but quietly Favors has allowed only 46.4% at the rim himself.  That’s stingier rim stoppage than Nerlens Noel, Tim Duncan, Omer Asik, DeMarcus Cousins, Andre Drummond, both Gasol brothers, and Anthony Davis.  And that’s your clear #2 rim protector.

Combined, they rank 1st in the league in both opponent field goal percentage at the rim and block percentage.  That’s the best rim protection in the NBA.  Period.

Only the frontcourt for the basketball buzzsaw that is the Golden State Warriors compares to the Jazz duo in terms of defensive impact around the hoop.  Andrew Bogut and Draymond Green have taken role acceptance and gritty defense to an art form this season.  Even so, consider that the Warriors are allowing a league-best 42.1% from the field compared to the Jazz’s 45.8%.  That’s more defensive rebound opportunities.  While Favors and Gobert have produced as an average defensive rebounding combination by the standards of starting bigs, just a single rebound more per 100 possessions vaults them into top 10 territory.  Now consider the formula of more Rudy Gobert defense with no Enes Kanter on the boards.

The Jazz duo will climb the defensive rebounding ranks quickly to close the season.  With that component in place, one literally could not design a better defensive pairing to protect the paint.

On the offensive end, things are less certain but just as exciting due to the possibilities.  Favors and Gobert already have elite offensive skills to build from: extreme shooting efficiency (2nd), drawing frequent free throws (8th), and offensive rebounds (3rd).  This combination provides a floor of solid contribution on the offensive end, as the duo is capable of manufacturing points and adding reliability to a Jazz offense that sometimes suffers painful droughts.

But there is potential for so much more.

How efficient can the frontcourt remain now that Enes Kanter’s 25.2% USG5 is sharing the court with Russell Westbrook?  That offensive usage will have to go somewhere.  Gordon Hayward can’t reasonably be expected to assume all of it, or even most of it, given the disproportionate burden he already carries within the offense.  Joe Ingles simply isn’t capable of doing so, to say nothing of Dante I’m-Just-Trying-Not-To-Drown Exum.  That leaves the bigs.

Perhaps the biggest question of the remainder of the Jazz season is how the offensive efficiency of the frontcourt will endure greater responsibility.  Personally, I believe Gobert will quickly prove he is capable of holding his own.  I expect Favors do to more than that and thrive.  There will be growing pains, certainly, in some ways suggesting Gordon Hayward’s struggles with his greatly increased role last season.  But I expect Favors to acclimate quickly, increasingly showing a more polished and diverse offensive game than most credit him for.

Most exciting of all, to my mind, is the glaring lack of a weakness in these numbers.  The young Jazz duo is one of only four frontcourts in the league without a blush of crimson marring their row on the chart.  The areas where Favors and Gobert clearly have the most room to grow, point and assist generation, are largely a function of responsibility and opportunity within an offense.  With Kanter now out of the rotation, it is their opportunity to demonstrate that there is even more than they’ve shown thus far.  My guess it will express, at least partially, in an increase of high/low post action and better early passing into the post.

Oh, and there’s only one younger frontcourt in the league, and that 76er combo includes one Henry Sims.

Yes, Enes Kanter’s defensive limitations6 and non-existent passing played a role in the Jazz trading him, as likely did his discontent with his situation in Utah, both publicly and privately.  Considerations included Kanter’s restricted free agency or possible qualifying offer, team chemistry, and available returns on the Jazz’s investment of a #3 pick.  But all of that was secondary to the simple, central truth.

The Jazz have the frontcourt around which to build a championship contender, and they needed to cement that foundation, make it the very bones of the organization.  Now, they have done just that, issuing a clear declaration that their future will be built on the shoulders of twin giants.

Clint Johnson

Clint Johnson

Clint Johnson is a professional author, writing educator, and editor. He teaches writing at Salt Lake Community College. A frequent presenter at both writing and educational conferences, he writes about the Jazz as a break from his other writing work.
Clint Johnson

Latest posts by Clint Johnson (see all)


  1. Paul Johnson says:

    At first I was very chagrined by the Enes Kanter trade. However, for the reasons you have stated–not because of any shortcomings of Kanter, who is a fine young, talented front court player–this was an addition-by-subtraction move for the Jazz.

    And, I think the Jazz actually like the potential of the two young players received in the trade–Tibor Pleiss and Grant Jerrett. Pleiss has good offensive skills, is a good rebounder, and has potential to be a solid-but-not-elite defender. Jerrett was a highly talented prospect coming out of high school, came out of college much too early, but has very good potential as a PF who can shoot (both short and long-range–although he has almost no post-up game, despite having decent size and athleticism for a PF.

    Also, I could get extremely excited if the Jazz sped up the re-build–while Dante is developing, which may take 3-4 years–by stealing away Patrick Beverley from Houston with the money freed up by trading Kanter and Novak. Add Beverley to have a starting five of Beverley, Burks, Hayward, Favors and Gobert, and the Jazz could have a lineup that would be devastating on both offense and defense.

    • Clint Johnson says:

      Lindsey is still clearly trying to get that stretch four he’s wanted for a while now. I’m not sure if either of these guys will end up being a solution to that need, even temporarily, but they’re low risk experiments. Worth seeing, certainly.

      I truly believe the Jazz think they have their frountcourt for contention in Hayward, Favors, and Gobert. You’re right, it’s the backcourt that will largely determine if the team plateaus at merely good or genuine contender. Exum is really important. If he can become an above average to elite pick and roll player and defender, the Jazz may have all the major pieces for a contender on the squad right now.

      • Paul Johnson says:

        At least they’re both content to be low-cost backups, and any production the Jazz get from them is “gravy.”

        I would really like to see the Jazz go after Beverley–with his I-will not-be-intimidated-by-anyone attitude, his on the ball defense, his 3-point shooting, as well as his other skills (after all, he is this year’s winner of the skills challenge), I think he could make the Jazz significantly better immediately. And, I think the Jazz could continue to focus on developing Exum even with Beverley. However, they would have to trade Burke, which would not upset me.

        • Mewko says:

          Fast forward your brain to June 2015.
          So let’s say that the Jazz really like what they see in Stanley Johnson or D’Angelo Russell. They want to trade up to nab the Lakers’ pick.

          Lakers receive R. Hood and our 8th pick.
          Jazz receive LA’s 4th pick

          LA does this for a young point guard, and a solid prospect at #8.
          UTAH does this for a prospect they really love, (be it Johnson or Russell)

          C Gobzilla –
          PF D-Favs – T Booker
          SF G-Time – Stan Johnson
          SG A Burks – Jingles
          PG D eXum – T Burke

          We round out the roster by signing Ryan Hollins or Henry Sims.
          Stan Johnson could develop his first two years, and challenge Alec Burks for the starting spot in 2018. You gotta love Stan’s potential as a 3-and-D wing.

  2. Brent says:

    Now can we do something about our bottom 5 backcourt?
    That is the fun thing to think about. Exum grows, and Burks returns in 2015-16.

    • Paul Johnson says:

      Add Patrick Beverley with the Jazz free agent money that is available because of the trades of Kanter and Novak. I love his attitude, his shooting and his overall game. I think he would be a perfect fit for the Jazz, while the Jazz are developing Exum. And if Exum never pans out, Beverley could be a good fit at PG for the Jazz even after that–he’s only 27. And, the Rockets don’t seem to value him highly–with all the talk about the Rockets going for one of the more high-profile free agent point guards, so they might let him go, if he got a big offer in RFA.

    • Clint Johnson says:

      I haven’t looked at it in detail, but I suspect that the backcourt is bottom five in the league. Injuries plus youth is not a great formula for productivity, certainly.

      Exum’s growth is as important as anything else on the team. I’m still a Burks fan, so to my mind, Exum’s ability to be a solid starting point guard the season after next is key. This season, little steps at an erratic pace is fine as the team delves the lottery one more time for more talent. Next year, he needs to be a legitimate NBA rotation player to help the team push for a .500 winning percentage. The season after, this team should make the playoffs, and Exum needs to be contributing to that rather than hindering it.

  3. Spencer says:

    We have two real opportunities this summer to really improve the team.

    1- The draft. If we get lucky and get a top-3 pick we need to do nothing other than pick Di-Angelo Russell or the other PG in the top 3. If not, then I would do everything in our power to get into the position to pick Russell. That would be the ideal fit. If that is not possible I love Looney’s potential if he can play SF. If not there are a lot of other talented wing prospects. They have the talent to be a Leonard or Butler, but they will all need their work ethic as well.

    2- FA market. Depending on the draft we can go after someone to fill the other hole. If we get an elite PG we get a wing (Butler, Leonard (pipe dreams I know)) Mathews, Carroll, Middleton, Dudley, Green fro SA, KJ McDaniels etc. If we draft a wing, I would still go for a lesser cost veteran wing, but go all out for PG. I actually do like the idea of Patrick Beverly, but liked Dragic more before he was traded.

    I really like this year’s free agents. They are my kind of player and the Jazz’s kind of player to (no coincidence some of the best are old Jazzmen and fan favorites.) With Snyder’s coaching and losing Kanter’s lack of basketball IQ, I see a real possibility of following the Hawk’s model to a more sustainable contender status in 2-3years.

    • Mewko says:

      If the Jazz end up with a big from the draft, have him play off the bench, and go after wings in free agency. I really love Kris Middleton.

  4. Spencer says:

    Also, the silver lining to our pathetic backcourt production is that the front court is getting used to doing heavy lifting and we are not winning like we would with even an average producing backcourt. That is fine for this year, not for next.

    • Clint Johnson says:

      We’re 2-0 with the Favors/Gobert combo starting. Let’s see how this plays out, especially with Burke starting to look like a genuine 6th man off the bench.

  5. The Other Spencer says:

    I gotta say that I called it with Enes Kanter finally living up to his #3 draft position (at least offensively.) Gobert is a monster, and I’m still a believer in Exum. I think he has the athleticism to really compete, and that most of his struggles this season are just from adapting to a different style of play than he’s used to.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *