How Does Stan Van Gundy’s New Gig Affect Jazz Search?

May 14th, 2014 | by Laura Thompson
Sam Sharpe - USA Today Sports

Sam Sharpe – USA Today Sports

As Jazz fans, we were probably looking at our head-coaching vacancy and thinking that we were looking like a significantly better destination than Detroit, thanks to young talent, draft picks, money to spend, and ownership that is nothing if not supremely loyal to the coach.

Considering many reports had Stan Van Gundy heading to Golden State, we were probably pretty confident and safe in feeling like Detroit would never be a more sought-after destination for a top head coach than Salt Lake City, but what we’ve learned in the last 24 hours is that there’s more to wanting to be a head coach than just being the head coach.

Just ask Doc Rivers.

This Adrian Wojnarowski article from October chronicled the drama surrounding Doc, the Clippers, and the JJ Redick trade that owner Donald Sterling almost nixed. Obviously, with recent events surrounding Sterling, a few more details have come to light regarding Sterling’s reasons for wanting to nix the trade, but, even at the time, it was clear to see why Doc Rivers would want final say in personnel decisions because it related so closely with how effectively his team could play. Without Redick’s sharpshooting, the Clippers wouldn’t be in the second round of the playoffs right now.

Given what we saw this last season as Jazz fans, where the goals of the front office and coaching staff didn’t always appear to be in perfect alignment, you can begin to understand a little bit more clearly why Stan Van Gundy would want that kind of power if he were to take over a very poor—and very poorly constructed—Detroit team. He might be thinking, ‘There’s no way I can be a successful coach in Detroit if I don’t have control over which players are staying and going.’ Kind of like how Tyrone Corbin said he knew it wasn’t good for him and his staff when Al Jefferson and Paul Millsap were allowed to sign with other teams.

Who are the only other coaches in the league who have final say over player personnel? Doc Rivers and Gregg Popovich. Maybe they’re on to something. (Granted, being an awesome coach helped to get them there, but I digress).

Golden State was the other team Van Gundy was considering, but they weren’t willing to budge when he asked for control over player personnel decisions. In Detroit, he’ll have control over player personnel, he can create the culture he wants, and he can build the team, theoretically over a five-year period. Several months back, Brett Brown, coach of the 76ers, discussed how building something requires 3-5 years.

So, if a big-name coach realizes how important personnel decisions are to his ability to coach and be successful, will the Jazz still be able to target and court a big-name coach? Or will Van Gundy’s decision to choose Detroit open the way for other highly sought-after coaches to also demand final say in player personnel decisions? Does that hurt the Jazz’s coaching vacancy appeal?

Does it mean that, instead of focusing on big names, the Jazz need to focus more on a hungry assistant type 1—like Hornacek was last year—or someone looking to make the jump either from Europe (Messina is very intriguing) or the college ranks (Kevin Ollie, anyone?).

At the very least, Stan Van Gundy’s decision highlighted a wrinkle in the coaching search that I know I hadn’t considered, as a Jazz fan: the importance of player personnel decisions. Because on paper, Golden State’s opportunity looked a whole lot more interesting and appealing when I was just looking at the coaching opportunity. But as a package with President of Basketball Operations being thrown in there, it makes sense. Is that something the Jazz can compete with, given that Dennis Lindsey is already that guy and I don’t envision a situation where that control is handed over to a coach?

Jazz fans, what do you think? Is this move going to start a domino effect among coaches wanting more power and control? How does that affect the Jazz? Or is it exclusive to only the really big-name coaches, leaving most teams in a similar position as before?

Laura Thompson

Laura Thompson

I grew up in California, but have been a Jazz fan pretty much since I was in diapers; I went to Karl Malone's basketball camp when I was 11 and I flew up to Utah in 1997 to go to Game 3 of the Finals. After graduating from BYU in 2008, I moved back to California to work in Marketing and have been doing that for the last five years. My favorite things in life are the Utah Jazz, basketball, food (whether cooking or consumption of), reading, church, black Labs, and the beach (though hopefully not in that order).
Laura Thompson

  • Utah’s Early Off-Ball Issues
    Analytics
    9
    November 24th, 2014

    Utah’s Early Off-Ball Issues

    As the league reaches the end of November, initial excitement over a new season begins to give way to more of a “daily grind”...Read More

5 Comments

  1. LKA says:

    I don’t think any other team will follow pattern of this signing.. Pistons wanted him badly and gave him his dessert too.. I am glad someone was finally hired to get the ball rolling. Knicks and GS should be next. I don’t really want a recycled coach. There was a reason they were fired. I do hope Lindsey acts soon so the good ones are not all gone..

  2. Wonzi Bells says:

    I don’t know, I think it was exclusive only to SVG. He suffered firings from his last two jobs based on internal and non-coaching-related conflicts and player personnel decisions, even though he was one of the best in the game at coaching. He wasn’t going to suffer that fate again. For the Jazz, I think they shouldn’t really be focusing on big names really at all (unless George Karl is calling), their teams seems more ept to hire someone like Hornacek since their team is so young and would benefit with fast pace.

  3. Don says:

    A big part of a successful coach’s role, especially in a small market, is recruiting free agents. Sad, but that is today’s NBA. Big name coaches can attract top talent. Not as easily as Miami nightclubs can, but their reputation can make or break a small market team.

    Combining the GM and head coach roles will only help recruiting efforts. Expect more of it, especially in small market and less-desirable locations.

  4. Clint Johnson says:

    Group-think is a major risk for organizational decision-making structures, and nothing promotes group-think like exchanging a group for an individual. I like the way the Jazz are handling the situation. It sounds as if there is a lot of actual dialogue going on, and the goal was clearly never to get the flavor of the moment (Kerr) or the celebrity hire (a Van Gundy). The best decision making in the NBA happens when there is trust, respect, and openness between ownership, management, and coaching, such as exists in San Antonio with Peter Holt, R. C. Buford, and Popovich. The Jazz need to structure that environment on the upper end then get a coach they feel confident enough in to invite into that structure. I think plenty of good coaches would welcome a chance to work with Greg Miller and Dennis Lindsey rather than against a Donald Sterling (in Rivers’ case) or Pat Riley (in SVG’s).

  5. Paul Johnson says:

    Kevin Ollie intrigues me. He was able to get the most out of a very young group of players. He could always hire some veteran coaches to assist him on the bench.

    Messina also seems to be a great teacher of fundamentals, something that is sorely needed in today’s NBA with all of the young players coming into the league before they really know how to play.

Leave a Reply