Is C.J. Miles the key to the Jazz season?

December 3rd, 2010 | by K.Malphurs

C.J. Milesis not going to be the best player on this Jazz team.  At best I think he could be the 5th best player behind Deron Williams, Paul Millsap, Al Jefferson and Andrei Kirilenko.  That, however, doesn’t mean that Miles isn’t the key to a season where the Jazz (hopefully) make the jump from good to great.  Why is a player who isn’t even a starter, or one of the best players, possibly the key to the Jazz season?

AP Photo

In trying to answer the above questions lets look at the Jazz lineup more closely.  Right now the Jazz have two below-average shooting guards in Miles and the starter Raja Bell.  Neither are particularly good shooters (32%-33% from 3 and less than 42% from the field for both of them), and neither stand out as above-average in any statistical category.  They both have less than average WS/48 (average = 0.10) with Bell coming in at 0.062 and Miles only slightly higher at 0.072.  It isn’t really that big of a surprise to see that the Jazz production by position has the shooting guard position as a -4.9 PER compared to their opponent.  The fault on this lies on primarily with Bell and Miles since they play the majority of the Jazz minutes there.

The shooting guard position isn’t a team strength, so let’s do a little more analysis and compare the two players who play there most.  Bell is a better shooter this year and overall from the line, the field and from three.  Miles is more athletic and thus has a higher rebounding %, steal % and block %.  He also has a higher assist % (12.1 compared to 6.3).  Still they aren’t too different when you compare the individual stats with Miles coming out only barely ahead. However, when you compare the team stats it is a completely different story.  The +/- when Miles is on the court is +133, while Bell is -48.  The team’s win percentage when Miles is on the court is 82.4% compared to Bell who comes in at 43.8% (check out some of the stats from to see the differences in the play of the Jazz when both players are on the court).

For a little more clarity lets compare the Jazz starting lineup (Williams, Bell, Kirilenko, Millsap, Jefferson) with the starting lineup when Miles replaces Bell.  These are the top two lineups that Coach Sloan has used this year.  In 331.9 minutes the starting lineup has been outscored by 23 points.  They score on average 1.02 points per possession and give up 1.07 points per possession.  When Miles replaces Bell, the team (in only 62.3 minutes) has outscored the opponents by 51 points.  They score on average 1.36 points per possession (.34 points more) and give up 0.94 points per possession (0.13 less) to their opponents.  All it took for the Jazz to go from an average team to the 1996 Chicago Bulls is substituting Bell for Miles.  Now before anyone writes this let me stress that all of this is based on a small sample size, which could mean that everything changes.  Also, I recognize it just might mean that Bell is facing tough competition (the starting shooting guard) while Miles gets to play against the backups.  I know both of those things, but you can’t ignore numbers like that.

Now if both players really aren’t that different why do the Jazz play so much better with Miles ?  Here are a few theories:

  1. Miles is a better defender– This is probably the most plausible explanation.  Miles is taller, quicker and just from watching the games looks to be much better on defense.  Opponents are shooting an eFG% of 37% when Miles replaces Bell in the starting lineup.  With Bell the starting lineup gives up 45% shooting.
  2. Miles shoots the ball– One of my main problems with watching Bell is that he doesn’t do anything.  It isn’t like he is playing poorly, but sometimes it would be nice if the shooting guard actually shot the ball.  He seems to be content passing the ball around the wing and doesn’t look for this shot nearly as much as Miles.  The numbers reflect this.  Bell’s usage rating is the 3rd lowest on the team at 14.4%.  Miles, on the other hand, is second behind Deron Williams with a usage rating of 26.7%.    Miles is 4th in field goal attempts despite being 6th in minutes.  Bell is 6th in field goal attempts despite being 5th in minutes. My theory is that defenses have to respect the threat of Miles shooting the ball (even if he isn’t an above average shooter) more so than Bell and that opens up the offense.  With extra spacing it gives Millsap and Jefferson a chance to dominate inside.  The defenses seem to collapse and guard the paint more with Bell on the court.
  3. He shoots the ball more from close range – Miles shoots 23% of his shots from close range compared to only 9% for Bell.  This has two advantages.  One it it is easier to shoot from up close (Bell makes 70% while Miles makes 61%).  The second one is that while I can’t proof this I think Miles moves more without the ball than Bell.  It seems to me that Bell stands outside the three point line and is strictly a catch and shoot player.  Miles is a little bit more dynamic and that movement is something that is critical to Coach Sloan’s offense.

The season is only 20 games in and the Jazz are playing great.  A 15-5 record makes me rethink my intial forecast of 50 wins and as a Jazz fan I have no problem with being wrong by guessing too low.  Part of the reason for the Jazz record has to be C.J. Miles.   Looking at those +/- numbers makes me think that Miles is really lucky, good or both.  Let’s hope for both and that despite pedestrian raw numbers there is some magic to the way Miles plays that allows the Jazz to continue their strong play with him on the court.  Overall I think that he is the key to the Jazz season.


Latest posts by K.Malphurs (see all)

  • no-cover
    Al Jefferson
    August 28th, 2013

    Once a Jazzman, Always a Jazzman

    Once a Jazzman, always a Jazzman. That is something I wholeheartedly believe and I think most Utah fans feel the same way. Some...Read More


  1. TroutBum says:

    Question: Do you watch the games, or go strictly by stats and +/-?

    Don’t bother answering, because it’s obvious that you don’t watch. The Jazz haven’t had a more lazy, inconsistent, chucking, cry baby titsy mouse since Carlos Arroyo. Miles doesn’t hustle, box out, fill the lanes, pass, and seldom penetrates — and when he does, it’s usually a turnover.

    Is he the best we’ve got on the second unit? Gods, I hope not — but that doesn’t mean he’s good, or even in the same universe as good. Put me on a girls Jr. Jazz team, and I could dominate. Ya savvy? The C.J. Miles experiment needs to come to an end. 5 years after it started, it’s clear to anyone who actually knows basketball that he is not good enough, doesn’t have the drive or passion to get better, and will always be a chucker. He’d fit great on a Mike D’Antoni team.

  2. Kevin Malphurs says:

    Just for clarification I don’t think Miles is good if you define good as being above average. I write about how shooting guard “isn’t a team strenght” and how Miles is below average. I tried to make it clear that while Miles isn’t good (and I agree with some of your critque on his abilities) he is better than the alternatives of Bell or Hayward. I would love for the Jazz to have a better shooting guard, but if the team is going to stay the same I think Miles gives them the best chance of winning.

  3. I think that CJ Miles performance is key to getting ahead in this season. Though honestly, the key to any championship team is depth. I think that CJ is starting to get it, and comparing the regular season this year to the regular season of last year, I think that there is an incredible difference. Let’s hope that he can stay healthy and motivated and energized through the season and into the playoffs.

  4. TroutBum says:

    Kevin –

    Alright, I dig it. I must say that when the Jazz signed Bell, my heart died a little. When I saw how long we signed him for, it fell into my anal cavity. Having Bell play over Miles is like picking Lung Cancer over AIDS. Lose/Lose.

    As for The Great White whatever he is, I would rather see Haward getting the minutes over one of those two. I loath watching our first round pick rot on the bench.

  5. C.J. Miles says:


    Ignore this Troutclown. He came stalkin’ my ass on FB and me and my momz hadz to boot him off. Word is he’s an insurance salesman but I doubt he’s very successful. He seems to spend more time tryin to troll me than make a buck and support his kids and tasty wife.


  6. stargazer says:

    Your stats are wrong. Bell shoots above 40% and Miles shoots below 40%.

    Both are are in the low 30’s shooting threes. Bell is a far better defender. This article makes no sense. Miles is inconsistent at shooting to be kind, lazy, can’t dribble under pressure, high turn over rate, doesn’t rebound and plays defense with his hands.

  7. Kevin Malphurs says:

    First off the stats I used were before the Dallas game. However, I confused as to what stats I used that were wrong. I write that Bell is a better shooter, and I also write that “neither are particularly good shooters.” The stats I use are that they are both 32-33% from three and less than 42% from the field. After the Dallas game below are the shooting stats for both players;

    Bell: 41% (FG), 32% (3 point) and 92% (free throw)
    Miles: 39.7% (FG), 32% (3 point) and 83% (free throw)

    Again I state that neither player are really great shooters. What specific stats do you think I was wrong on? I am very curious since I spend plenty of time of looking at stats and would be concerned if I misquoted one.

    Also, I would ask that you read the article again because I think you missed the point. I wasn’t trying to say that C.J. Miles is a great player or even an above average player. All I was trying to do was point out the difference between Miles and Bell and try (repeat try) to come up with a reason the Jazz +/- statistics are so much better with Miles on the court as opposed to Bell. The theories might be wrong and your comments on Bell vs. Miles might be 100% true.

    • stargazer says:

      Thanks for the response. Long term, Bell is a better shooter. Probably because he has a better shot with less arm motion than Miles. Perhaps I’m missing the point of your article because it makes no sense to me to say Miles is the key to anything. The +/- stats have no meaning. It’s not a real model of anything. Too many unknown variables. It’s like predicting the weather with your finger in the air. Remember, Bell plays against the other teams starters. He works hard, by comparison to Miles, with picks, passes, rebounding and defense. But forget Bell, the problem I have with Miles is he seems to have no basketball IQ and is fundamentally weak. If Miles is the key to the Jazz success, then you must be defining success as something pretty low.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *