Jazz Draft Profile: K.J. McDaniels

April 14th, 2014 | by Dakota Schmidt
(Photo by Brett Carlsen/Getty Images)

(Photo by Brett Carlsen/Getty Images)

With Utah’s uneventful 2013-14 season quickly coming to a close, it’s about time to take a peek at the wide array of potential prospects who will be available for June’s NBA Draft. As this season has progressed, my fantastic Salt City Hoops correspondents have taken thorough looks at the likes of Andrew Wiggins, Dante Exum, Jabari Parker and Aaron Gordon as potential options for Utah’s high lottery spot.

That in mind, the Jazz will potentially have two more opportunities to add pieces to their team with the 23rd and 35th pick in June’s NBA Draft. While the wide array of potential draft prospects could diminish as we move closer to summer, it’s still a good time to look at some possible options for the Jazz.

One of those potential gaps that Utah will need to fill in would be at the wing position (SG/SF). While that area wasn’t too deep to begin with, the possible departures of Richard Jefferson, Gordon Hayward and Brandon Rush could create a lot of potential openings for the Draft. One of the more probable ways for Utah to fill in those holes would be by utilizing that 23rd pick. While the superstar caliber prospects would more than likely have vanished by that point, there are still some potentially solid options that the Jazz could look at. As we near June’s NBA Draft, I’m going to take a look at some of the more unknown prospects that Utah could look at with their late 1st/early 2nd round picks.

To start this series off, we’re going to take a look at an extremely talented prospect out of Clemson. Despite the ACC’s continued dominance in the world of college basketball, the Clemson Tigers haven’t exactly been a known hotbed for NBA prospects. That notion could be changed by the extremely athletic 6’6 guard K.J. McDaniels.

For the variety of different types of players who make that transition to the NBA, it seems that extremely athletic prospects make that easiest evolution to the Association. Besides Kansas forward Andrew Wiggins, the Clemson junior could be the most physically gifted wing in this year’s draft.

As apparent from the above video, McDaniels is an extremely explosive leaper. While those abilities can lead to some highlight-reel dunks on the offensive end, that trait has helped push his defensive game to a whole new level. Amongst NCAA wings, K.J McDaniels ranks first in the country with 3.3 blocks per 40 minutes.

While superb athletic ability has helped push McDaniels to his current level, the 21-year-old junior is able to be extremely effective because of his unique ability to control his aggression on the defensive end. What separates McDaniels from the majority of guards on any level is his ability to be able to locate the perfect opportunity to break away from his positional counterpart to attack the ball-handler. Even though his overall athleticism and quickness is a huge factor behind that trait, McDaniels also seems to have an extremely solid overall defensive IQ. That strong defensive intelligence has also helped him as an on-ball defender.

As we move to the offensive end, McDaniels continues to use his athleticism as his number one weapon. Like previously mentioned, the 21-year-old Clemson is able to use his solid athleticism and leaping ability to be an extremely effective and exciting transition threat. With that in mind, McDaniels is able to use that athleticism alongside that aforementioned instinct to be an extremely effective weapon. While he isn’t the best ball-handler, McDaniels can constantly find ways to penetrate his way to the paint to either put in those earth-shattering slams or get to the free throw line. When the 6’6 wing isn’t putting down those highlight-reel plays, he’s able to control his lanky and athletic frame around the rim.

While athleticism has potentially pushed McDaniels into that upper-echelon of possible draft prospects, he still seems to struggle when he moves away from the paint. During the 2013-14 season, McDaniels shot an extremely pedestrian 30% from beyond the arc on about four attempts per outing.

Despite the less than stellar shooting percentage, McDaniels shouldn’t be classified as a non-shooting threat. Per 40 minutes, McDaniels made around 1.4 perimeter jumpers which would have put him in that upper-echelon with the other draft-eligible small forwards. With that in mind, his shooting stroke is still extremely solid. When McDaniels made his way to the charity stripe, he was able to shoot an incredibly stellar 84%, which put him in the top-5 among the draft-eligible players in this year’s NBA Draft class.

In terms of his potential role with the Utah Jazz, McDaniels would fill an immediate role with the team.

Offensively, the 6’6 Clemson wing would immediately help out because of his solid ability to cut to the rim and get to the charity stripe. During the ’13-14 season, the Jazz sit 23rd in the NBA in terms of free throw attempts per game. While McDaniels won’t exactly become the next version of James Harden, he should still be able to add an extra element to the Jazz.

When we move to the other end of the court, the 6’6 wing is able to use the combination of superb athleticism and intelligence to be extremely effective. While it’s way too early to predict how the entire Jazz roster will be set up for the 2014-15 season, the addition of McDaniels could help make Utah’s defense into a more frightening unit.

Dakota Schmidt

A Wisconsinite who spends way too much time watching mediocre basketball. Started to love the game as I watched the "Big 3" era of the Bucks in the early 2000's but was eventually raised on the teams lead by the likes of Michael Redd, Desmond Mason and Andrew Bogut. Those mediocre teams helped me grow an appreciation for the less than spectacular style of basketball which has lead me to different gigs with Queen City Hoops (Bobcats), Ridiculous Upside (D-League) and now Salt City Hoops.

Latest posts by Dakota Schmidt (see all)

  • Examining Utah Jazz Shot Charts
    Analytics
    17
    July 25th, 2014

    Examining Utah Jazz Shot Charts

    In today’s media-savvy basketball world, there are a number of methods available to analysts like myself to evaluate players,...Read More

  • How Important is Passing?
    Utah Jazz
    1
    July 24th, 2014

    How Important is Passing?

    Being that most of you are all supporters of the former team of the NBA all-time assists leader and one of the greatest passers...Read More

9 Comments

  1. tc says:

    Nice post. Something’s up with your videos. They’re not showing up.

  2. Aaron says:

    Nice post. With all the uncertainty about where we’ll be picking or who is even coming out, it was a good idea to talk about some of the later picks. I’ve never heard of McDaniels, but he sounds like the exact type of player the Jazz so frequently find value from after all the glamour-pusses have gone. Another player I like is Cleanthony Early, although I’ve seen him going as high as 14. I appreciate the info and hope you’ll put some more out leading up to the draft.

  3. Timothy says:

    The future
    C Enes Kanter 16 PPG 10 RPG 35 3PT% Player Comparison-Al Horford
    PF Derrick Favors 13 PPG 12 RPG 3 BPG Player Comparison-Tyson Chandler
    SF Jabari Parker 23 PPG 4 RPG Player Comparison-Paul Pierce
    SG Gordon Hayward 14 PPG 5 RPG 4 APG 2 SPG Player Comparison-Nicolas Batum
    PG Trey Burke 16 PPG 8 APG 3 RPG Player Comparison-Mike Conley

    • zach says:

      Kanter only took 1 3pt this year, and missed…”35 3pt%” I hope is a mistake. With 5 players averaging those points you may get 15 from the bench, Burks will likely get 8-10, so you are only expecting 5-10 other points? That means our bench will not be very deep, and if one of the 5 go down, not a viable backup. All 5 would have to put in 40+min to get those stats.

    • Aaron says:

      I like most of those comparisons, but I’m not yet convinced that Kanter can play at Horford’s level. I was at the Hawks-Jazz game last season, and he lit us up. I hope you’re right, though.

  4. Paul Johnson says:

    I watched a few Clemson games near the end of the college season just to see McDaniels play. I didn’t know he was rated as a good defensive player. What I noticed was his offensive skills. And, he has good size and athleticism. Perhaps he could be one of the sleepers of the draft. I also like James Young for our GS Warriors pick, but alas, it appears that it may be too low in order to pick James Young.

  5. T. W. says:

    Damaree Carrol, the Jazz should’ve just kept him if we were gonna draft his prototype.

  6. Chad says:

    So the guy is athletic, can drive the paint and struggles from the 3 point line. I thought Alec already played for us. Differance is the Alec is showing improvement and was probably the most consistent Jazz player on the floor game in and game out.

    Wishful thinking Timothy.

    Kanter is a good 3rd big man not a starter. Favors should get better overall and I would expect him to be a 15/ao guy next year. Burke needs to shoot a higher percentage and fast. 36% from the floor is killing the Jazz. Between him and Hayward we do not have any type of deep threat. I’d like to see the Jazz land Parker but believe long term Wiggins will be the better player. Parker will more likley be the one who chooses to stay in Utah though. Hayward is going to be to expensive. Say good-bye to him. Maybe we can get a solid draft pick in return. Doubt it though. At 41% shooting o’well.

  7. Pingback: Jazz Draft Profile: Kyle Anderson | Salt City Hoops

Leave a Reply