Offseason Target: Danny Green

May 5th, 2015 | by Ben Dowsett
Photo by Noah Graham/NBAE via Getty Images

Photo by Noah Graham/NBAE via Getty Images

With the Spurs machine finally running out of gas after a historic first round slug-fest with the Clippers, the focus in some circles shifted to what’s likely San Antonio’s most pivotal offseason in several years. Tim Duncan and Manu Ginobili have contracts that expired Saturday night, and retirement is certainly a possibility from one or both. Marco Belinelli and Kawhi Leonard are also free-agents, though the former felt highly replaceable this year and the latter is almost certain to return. Even coach Gregg Popovich could have the slightest air of uncertainty about him inasmuch as his status is tied to that of Duncan and Ginobili.

Realistically, though, the most intriguing name to the league’s 29 other teams has to be Danny Green. He turns 28 and is a free agent just before the cap explodes, and may prove to be one of the key litmus tests for just how aggressive certain GMs are willing to be about pursuing deals that look bad for a year before becoming bargains almost overnight in summer 2016. He may also prove an intriguing test case for the perception from some that he’s a moderately valuable player inflated by the Spurs’ unique culture and scheme.

Green may have little interest in leaving San Antonio, but if he has any at all, expect the Jazz to be among his suitors. He knows Dennis Lindsey from their time together in the Spurs organization, and while he and Quin Snyder never directly crossed paths as coach and player, they’ll be well aware of each other after Snyder’s own involvement with the franchise in Austin.

The idea that his value is propped up by San Antonio’s system isn’t without reason, but two thoughts here. Firstly, this seems overstated to this eye – Green isn’t one of the league’s best open shooters or perimeter defenders just because of great schemes or chemistry, with several other elements falling in a similar category. More importantly, Snyder is openly modeling his scheme with San Antonio’s in mind; even if one assumes an exaggerated drop-off when leaving such a construct, this would hardly be the case for Green.

He’d fill several real needs right away on both ends of the floor. The Jazz were among the league’s worst open jump-shooting teams last season, posting the fourth-lowest percentage on all jumpers outside 10 feet where no defender stood within four feet, per NBASavant. Green was among the best volume guys in the league on these shots for the second year running, particularly from deep. 126 guys attempted at least 100 spot-up jumpers where they took no dribbles after the catch in the regular season; only Klay Thompson and Kyle Korver had a higher effective field-goal percentage1 than Green, per Synergy Sports.

Teams can run him off the line, his well-known weak point in San Antonio. A per-possession rate that’s in the league’s stratosphere plummets to sub-average levels when Green is forced to drive past closing defenders, per Synergy, and he’s never developed much as a kick-out passer here beyond the more obvious reads. But this is a consideration, not a deterrent; Green’s prowess and resulting gravity from deep, along with his utility on the other end of the floor, make a slight deficiency easy to cover especially considering Utah’s other strong ball-handlers at the wings.

And it’s his play defensively that’d really seal the deal for the Jazz if there were mutual interest. Green might not be a markedly better defender than a guy like Elijah Millsap2, but what he brings on offense along with it makes him a much rarer commodity. He posted the sixth-best DRPM figure of all shooting guards on the year, and was particularly effective against opposing isolations3 and spot-up attempts despite often checking the opposition’s best perimeter shooter.

He’s the prototypical “3-and-D” guy, one of the very few who does both these things on an elite level without many noticeable holes elsewhere in his game. He’s played the same sort of scheme Snyder runs versus pick-and-rolls – most often a conservative one, with bits of aggression mixed in for various personnel and opposition – for years.

Many will wonder who gets the short end of the minutes stick in this hypothetical scenario, which isn’t entirely without merit. But Green brings a skill set that’s an undeniable upgrade, and also opens up a few interesting possibilities for the Jazz that might make a few extra minutes available.

He’s a strong enough defender to neutralize many point guards, and Snyder could experiment with lineups where he did so alongside two of Gordon Hayward, Alec Burks and Rodney Hood, who could share lead ball-handling duties on the other end if nights where both Dante Exum and Trey Burke struggle remain too common. He can also shift up to many small forwards effectively enough, and would only add to the length brigade Utah is building on the perimeter and the defensive versatility that comes with it.

Bringing Green in might push a fan favorite out the door, but up-and-coming teams like the Jazz have to face hard truths at times, and we may be approaching one of these soon: The likelihood that Hayward, Hood and Burks are the current roster’s only safe-bet reliable rotation wings on a Western Conference contender moving forward. The most cynical of observers might even cast a few doubts about the latter two4.

Things could also get slightly tricky salary-wise, but there are plenty of scenarios where this is easy enough to work around. It’s important to remember that the draft would take place before a potential pitch to Green; if Utah ends up holding onto their pick and grabbing a possible ready-now third big like Frank Kaminsky, it could even become worth it to either dump or cut Trevor Booker’s $4.75 million to carve enough room to bring Green on in July. And signing Green in without losing Booker is far from impossible as well, pending his asking price and any other potential personnel movement.

In either case, the Jazz could fit Green on a multi-year deal without jeopardizing their ability to hold onto their core pieces down the line. It’s true that there’s a larger current talent need at the point guard spot, but if the front office’s frequent statements on the subject are taken at face value, a move to a long-term upgrade won’t be in the cards this summer. A true 3-and-D guy like Green or Khris Middleton is almost certainly the next best thing for this roster as far as win-now moves go for next season. The Jazz should, and almost certainly will, take a look if there’s any indication from Green’s camp that he’d be amicable to a move.

Ben Dowsett

Ben Dowsett

Ben Dowsett is a life-long Jazz fan and current in-depth analyst based in Salt Lake City. He also writes for Basketball Insiders and BBallBreakdown, and can be heard on SCH Radio on ESPN 700 weekly. He can be found on Twitter at @Ben_Dowsett.
Ben Dowsett
Ben Dowsett

Latest posts by Ben Dowsett (see all)

  • The George Hill Impact
    George Hill
    June 22nd, 2016

    The George Hill Impact

    The NBA Draft is a day away, but the Utah Jazz can already count themselves among the winners. In a big, sneaky good move,...Read More

  • On Trades, Talent and Tiers
    June 17th, 2016

    On Trades, Talent and Tiers

      We’re a week away from the NBA Draft, which is great for people who have a physiological reaction to the words...Read More


  1. Matt says:

    Landing Green would be incredible. By my reckoning, he’s a top 30 player. Adding him would give UTA four top 30 players and would very likely put UTA in the playoffs. I see two downsides. First, UTA would have to choose between Burks and Hood or relegate them both to 15-20 mpg (plus, we might not find out how good they are ’til they’re on a different team). Second, Green is about at his peak now and will certainly be past his peak by the time Favors is at his, not to mention Gobert. So, not quite an ideal match there, but, hey, gotta pull the trigger if this is possible. I’m curious to see a spreadsheet of how UTA might pay Gobert, Hayward, Favors, and Green over the next 3-4 years with projections that include Exum and at least one of Burks/Hood.

  2. LKA says:

    Ben. Thoughts on Jazz going after Wes Matthews??

  3. Love the idea of Green, but we can’t lose Booker, and I think Hood is a better fit for Snyder’s offense than Burks…so if we lose anyone, I think Burks would be it.

    • Ben Dowsett says:

      Don’t really agree that the team can’t lose Booker if the right deal comes up. The difference between him and Burks is that there are guaranteed ways for the Jazz to get rid of his salary, where any trades involving Burks would have to have at least some modicum of matching involved and would almost certainly net less cap space (unless it was a straight salary dump, which is highly unlikely in his case and not something the Jazz should consider with a guy who is still a positive asset, easily).

  4. Matt says:

    Ben, what do you think about line-ups that don’t use a PG? Just put Burks, Hood, and Hayward out there together. Burks has shown he can defend PGs and all 3 can handle the ball and set up the offense. If this worked and Green was added, maybe Burke is the man left holding the short stick?

    • Ben Dowsett says:

      As I mentioned in the piece, I like the theory of these sorts of lineups in short bursts. That said, I wouldn’t use them without Green or the addition of another combo guard – I’m not as confident as you are that Burks can defend all but a few PGs he’ll face, and am more confident Green can do so.

  5. Patrick. says:

    There is nothing wrong in dreaming. He would be a great addition.

    But I dont think he is leaving Spurs. Primarily because its about championship vs being a role player on other teams. This will be the second year after their last championship. Typically, Spurs do well on the 2nd year after their championship. They have never won consecutive titles. But they have been mostly competitive on the second years. If green leaves that, he will be leaving an opportunity to compete for championship. But money have made men mad in the past. You never know.

  6. Clayson says:

    Does it give you pause that he played very poorly against the Clippers? I think it has to. Especially if the Jazz are locking him into a long term deal and eating up most of the cap space they have worked so diligently to maintain. You are counting on him plus the development of your other core pieces to take you into the playoffs and hopefully contention.

    • Ben Dowsett says:

      No, I’ll take a much larger sample of the prior two full seasons over a few bad games. Also, that cap space is only all they have for exactly one summer, after which they, like everyone else, have tons more.

    • Rich says:

      I didn’t see the entire series, but Green was pretty amazing on the defensive end in game 7. Probably the main reason the Spurs had a chance in that game. If we got that kind of defense combined with the defense we saw from this past season? Yeah, sign me up.

  7. casey says:

    A month or so ago, we had a twitter conversation where you advocated getting a third big over a wing. Is that still your preferred direction, or are you leaning 3&D guy now?

    • Ben Dowsett says:

      My preference would actually be to trade for a Jrue Holiday type at the point, or even better a combo guard type who can initiate the offense or play off the ball (part of the reason I like Jrue so much potentially). I don’t see many guys who would be both A. comfortable with 3rd-big minutes and B. significantly better than Booker worth using the space on, outside perhaps a Kaminsky type in the draft.

  8. Jason says:

    Not a fan of trying to pick up Green. He’s very streaky and does a few things well, but nothing great. He’ll be too expensive and not worth the money.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *