Archives For Indiana Pacers

Jazz 99 – Pacers 104

Spencer Hall —  February 7, 2012 — Leave a comment

Player Grades by Evan Hall

Utah Jazz 99 Final

Recap | Box Score

104 Indiana Pacers
Paul Millsap, PF

32 MIN | 5-7 FG | 8-8 FT | 10 REB | 4 AST | 18 PTS | -8

18 points on only 7 shots proves what everyone who watches the Jazz already know: Paul Millsap is one of the most efficient players in the game. The only way Millsap could have improved his game was by asserting himself more offensively. He has earned the green light on offense, and he needs to use it.

Gordon Hayward, SG

23 MIN | 4-8 FG | 3-4 FT | 3 REB | 3 AST | 11 PTS | -9

Maybe it was because he was playing in his home state, but Hayward played with energy during stretches where no one else did. The origin of the rally in the third quarter could be traced back to Hayward’s energy and willingness to run the floor. He virtually shut Danny Granger, a premiere scorer, out of the first half with his perimeter defense.

Al Jefferson, C

31 MIN | 6-17 FG | 4-5 FT | 8 REB | 3 AST | 16 PTS | -6

Al Jefferson essentially played two games tonight. During the first half, he was playing within the offense, shooting a high percentage, and carrying the team when offense was sparse. Unfortunately his second half, especially the final stretch of the fourth quarter was an unmitigated disaster: three key misses, ball-stopping offense, and a turnover that essentially killed the Jazz’s hopes. Furthermore, his defense on Hibbert was lacking: he didn’t deny entry passes and thus gave up position and easy buckets to Hibbert all night long.

Raja Bell, SG

21 MIN | 3-5 FG | 0-0 FT | 1 REB | 1 AST | 7 PTS | -3

Raja continues to shoot the ball well (especially from three), avoid turnovers, and play solid defense. Unfortunately, he did not get as many open looks as he, or frankly any of the Jazz fans, would have liked.

Devin Harris, PG

26 MIN | 4-9 FG | 2-2 FT | 1 REB | 3 AST | 11 PTS | -5

Offensively, there was a lot to like about Devin Harris’s game. He limited his ill-advised shots (only three by my count), pushed the ball, and attack the basket. Though Harris seems occasionally ignorant of this fact, there are two sides to the game, and on defense, for three quarters, Harris played uninspired, apathetic basketball. Darren Collison took advantage and scored 25 points when he normally averages only 11.

Earl Watson, PG

22 MIN | 0-3 FG | 0-0 FT | 2 REB | 7 AST | 0 PTS | 0

Watson looked limited defensively by his ankle, but his effort despite the injury was commendable. He always pushes the pace, runs the offense, and gets everyone involved, and this game was no different.

Josh Howard, SF

27 MIN | 2-6 FG | 4-4 FT | 4 REB | 0 AST | 8 PTS | -2

Josh Howard is beginning to regress back to his days in Washington. In this game, his shot was inconsistent, he looked frequently looked disinterested (even for him), and his handles are not improving. Still, he’s the team’s best free throw shooter (shocking, I know), and his brilliant stretches earlier on in the season show that he still has some of his all-star form.

C.J. Miles, SF

25 MIN | 5-9 FG | 0-0 FT | 3 REB | 2 AST | 12 PTS | +4

C.J’s three-point shooting was one of the few highlights of the first half. He took a few bad shots, but he gave the Jazz valuable offense off the bench.

Derrick Favors, FC

17 MIN | 5-8 FG | 0-0 FT | 5 REB | 0 AST | 10 PTS | +1

Though Favors got bullied down low by Indiana’s bigs, particularly Hansbrough, in the first half, he played a decent second half defensively. Favors is continuing to improve his post game, and he showed it off a few times tonight. Once he develops a consistent, face-up jumper, he’ll be unstoppable.

Enes Kanter, F

16 MIN | 3-6 FG | 0-0 FT | 6 REB | 0 AST | 6 PTS | +3

The only thing wrong with Kanter’s stat line is his minutes. When he was on the floor, he was a tenacious rebounder and defender and his back down and dunk on Louis Amundson was one of the highlights of the night.

In the final days leading up to regular season action, SCH will be posting divisional previews of the top teams in all six NBA divisions. Come back early and often for updates.

Key Matchups

Darren Collison vs. Deron Williams/Earl Watson

It’s hard to say exactly what the key matchups are going to be here. The Pacers always seem to be trading out half their roster, and basketball is a game of chemistry.  From a Jazz perspective, I think I’m most excited to see how Darren Collison matches up against elite point guards like Deron Williams. It’ll be interesting to see how he fits into/runs the offense and if he really is as good as he looked running things in CP3’s absence last year. When you’re playing behind one of the elite PG’s, all you have to do is NOT be terrible and everyone is happy. He overachieved in that situation, and now it’s time to see if that was a contract/one time thing, or if he is the real deal.

Danny Granger v. Andrei Kirilenko (or anyone he plays).

Keep an eye on Danny Granger, who still stands as the Pacer’s biggest threat to any and all opponents (averaged 24.1 ppg last season). He’s an extremely high scoring player with an ability to stuff the stat sheet on any given night… the real question with Granger is this: will he take time away from scoring to do the other menial (read: “fundamental”) things that he could do well? He’s the kind of player that has the ability to take over a game at a moment’s notice… if he really wants to. A healthy (contract year) Andrei should be able to limit his scoring opportunities, or at least slow him down and force Granger to use his teammates.

High Notes | Low Notes

The Pacers are a high octane offense. They run. Hard. They score fast and often, so if you can’t slow them down then you have to keep up. Unfortunately (for them), they have been terrible on the defensive side, which makes keeping up a bit easier.

The Pacers weren’t particularly great at anything last year. They were 16th in scoring, 19th in rebounding, and 23rd in points allowed, so until they pick some of those categories up, they’ll never really compete for the East.

History

Utah is 36-35 all time versus the Pacers, splitting two games last year. Last March when Utah played in Indiana, Granger scored 44 points (and had a 4 point play), showing how dangerous he really is. The Pacers need a playoff spot this year, and they can punish defenses that don’t take them seriously. If the Jazz sleep on them at all, it’ll be a quick loss. Saying that, if the Jazz play hard, they should dispense of Indiana pretty handily.

Here’s a random stat for you: On October 22, 1989 the Jazz scored their fewest points in franchise history (65) versus Indiana (in Indy). That game also stands as Utah’s greatest loss differential (-35). What’s that mean to the team this year? Nothing, but you’ll sound smart when you toss those numbers out over lunch when the Jazz face the Pacers this year.

Player/Coach Notes

As the second fastest team last year (I feel like I’ve mentioned their speed 15+ times in this article), you can bet that the Pacer’s coach, Jim O’Brien, will keep the team running. Add Collison’s ability to distribute the ball from point, and you can look for the Pacers system to improve from last year. Saying that, if I had to bet my life on one game between Jim O’Brien + Darren Collison, and Jerry Sloan + Deron Williams, I’m going with our Utah boys. Every. Single. Time.

Outlook

The Pacers need to do three things to have a successful season:

1) Develop their core: At some point, you have to play the hand you’ve been dealt. Granger is healthy, they have a great distributor in Collison, and you have some solid pieces (Rush, Dunleavy, Hansborough). You know you’re not going to challenge for the top of the east, but you can focus on developing the team and finally establishing a core to build around.

2) Stay healthy: Everything hinges on this. It seems silly because every team needs to stay healthy, but the Pacers are working with a razor thin bench, which means they have almost no margin for error. If they lose any key players, the season could slip away quickly.

3) Make the playoffs: The top of the east is strong, but the bottom is still a bit of a mess. The Pacers have a good opportunity to squeak into the 7 or 8 spot this year. Do that and make a bit of a stand with your core team intact, and I’d consider the season a success.

Follow Jeff on Twitter!