The Triple Team: Three Thoughts on Jazz vs. Pistons 3/24/2014

March 24th, 2014 | by Andy Larsen
(Photo by Melissa Majchrzak/NBAE via Getty Images)

Here’s one of Drummond’s easier points of the game. (Photo by Melissa Majchrzak/NBAE via Getty Images)

1. Everyone agrees the Jazz didn’t bring effort tonight. But is that all that occurred?

The official topic of discussion for this game is that the Jazz, for whatever reason, didn’t bring the effort tonight. Here are the relevant quotes:

  • Tyrone Corbin: “We came out from the beginning like we were running in mud.” Why? “I don’t know if we were thinking about the other night or what, but we gotta but a lot more energy than we showed tonight.”
  • Marvin Williams: “We didn’t have the energy that we had the other night. It was kind of disappointing. If we play with the energy we played with in the third quarter and start the game the way we started the third quarter we’ll put ourselves in a position to win games.”
  • Trey Burke: “It’s kind of disappointing with the way we came out against Orlando and fought for 48 minutes and gave ourselves a chance to win at the end, and then you come out and lose by 20 to the Pistons. I think the most important thing is they had more energy than us early on.”
  • Gordon Hayward: “We just didn’t come out with energy for whatever reason and it’s disappointing because we have such good fans that always provide us with energy and for whatever reason we didn’t have it tonight.”
  • Richard Jefferson: “We’re starting a rookie point guard, we’re starting guys who haven’t played 35 minutes. There will be nights when you’re flat. It sucks, but that’s the truth of the situation.”

This is all somewhat true, and I don’t think the Jazz had an exquisite level of energy to begin the game. But the Jazz fought back from their early 9-2 deficit, and only trailed by 3 with 10:23 left in the 2nd quarter. It was only then that the energy really trailed off, and with a usually favorable lineup too: the Jazz’s preferred starting lineup of Burke/Hayward/Jefferson/Williams/Favors allowed a 10-3 run during their 4+ minutes on the court in the second quarter.  In other words, it wasn’t the inexperience of the lineup1, but something else that allowed the Piston run.

One continual issue for the Jazz: making uncontested shots. The Jazz were awful while not being guarded tonight, shooting a remarkable 29.5% without a defender within 4 feet. This killed them against the pack-the-paint Pistons. It’s hard to say what a coach can do to fix this.

2. A quick thought on analyzing game rebounding numbers.

The Jazz got beaten on the boards badly, garnering just 33 rebounds to the Pistons 53. This is true. But as with all basketball stats, context is important. The first important thing to look at when you’re comparing rebound totals is how many rebound opportunities there were on defense for both teams. That 20 rebound differential seems like a lot, but when you take into account that the Pistons had 12 more shots to rebound on the defensive end, it doesn’t seem quite as bad.

Another contextual point: the NBA’s SportVu cameras track rebound chances2 for each game. The Pistons garnered their 53 rebounds in 81 opportunities (65%), while the Jazz got their 33 rebounds in 56 chances (59%).

So yes, the Jazz still got beaten on the boards, but it’s not the game-defining advantage that it appears to be at first glance. Instead, the key to the game was the percentage that each team shot from the field.

3. The Jazz’s turnovers were low. But is that a good sign?

The Jazz recorded a season low 7 turnovers tonight, but still lost by 20 despite their carefulness with the ball. That’s a good thing, yes, but is another example of how little secondary advantages and disadvantages sometimes matter. eFG% remains king.

Weirdly, though, I’m kind of worried by this. Kevin Pelton of ESPN has done some interesting research which indicates that turnovers are actually a positive statistical indicator for young players: in short, it shows that the player has some fearlessness and playmaking potential that he’s at least trying to take advantage of.

In particular, Trey Burke has the 4th best turnover % amongst NBA starting PGs. Sounds pretty good, right? But it might indicate that he’s not going for the pass as often as he should be. In particular, the guys around him amongst the low turnover PGs are all much better shooters than Trey is right now. Names like Lillard, Calderon, Conley, and Irving probably should be shooting as often as they are with their relatively efficient jump shots. On the other hand, Burke has shot only 38% for the season, his team might be better served by trying to be a playmaker a little bit more often. If that increases turnovers, so be it: the Jazz don’t have a lot to lose anyway. It’s probably worth finding out what kind of offense Trey Burke can really create through playmaking for others.

Andy Larsen

Andy Larsen

Andy Larsen is the Managing Editor of Salt City Hoops, the ESPN TrueHoop affiliate for the Utah Jazz. He also hosts a radio show and podcast every week on ESPN700 AM in Salt Lake City.
Andy Larsen

One Comment

  1. cw says:

    Good point about turnovers. That is a good example of how analytics (what’s abetter word here?) can help a coach.

    About the rebounds. What you are saying makes sense, but I wonder if teams that miss a lot of shots always lose on the rebounding. The correlation between shooting percentage and rebounds would be easy to check for someone with a database of boxscores. Although, what would that really tell you. Not much I guess. Never mind.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *