What Does the Spurs’ Championship Mean for the Jazz?

June 18th, 2014 | by Laura Thompson
Photo by Rocky Widner - NBAE via Getty Images

Photo by Rocky Widner – NBAE via Getty Images

Watching the Spurs win was great for this Jazz fan. In the Spurs you’ve got a team-first, small-market team that plays with precision, with passing, and without ego, and it was incredibly refreshing to see them beat the Heat so handily. But I specifically wondered how the Spurs winning would affect the Jazz. Here are a few points where I think we, as Jazz fans, can see a light at the end of the championship tunnel.

There’s hope for the small-market teams. Yes, Miami is somehow considered a small market since it’s not Los Angeles, New York City, or Chicago. And Miami still has more panache and flair than, say, San Antonio or Salt Lake City.1 But San Antonio is much more of a small market in the same vein that Salt Lake City is, far more than Miami is similar to Salt Lake City. There are fewer attractions (the beach of Miami, the celebrities of LA, the flash of New York City), less of a nightlife, maybe fewer endorsement opportunities thanks to being a smaller market, but both the Spurs and the Jazz have talked about patterning each team after the other, knowing the obstacles small markets face in a league with superstars wanting to play in big markets.

The Big Three Via Draft vs. The Big Three Via Collusion Free Agency. Okay, I know it’s not really collusion. There wasn’t anything against the rules with what LeBron, Wade, and Bosh did, but it takes a really unique situation to get three superstars to want to play in the same place, even taking a pay cut from what they could get elsewhere. If the Heat had won the series, as Dan Clayton has pointed out before, it would have created an even greater imbalance between the big markets where the superstars want to play there and the small markets trying to catch up. The have’s and the have not’s would have become even farther apart.

The importance of a great coach. This Finals series showcased two great coaches, but one of the coaches – Greg Popovich – is one of the best of all time, and had a bench and a point guard he could trust; Spoelstra did not. But Spoelstra kept trying different lineups, different looks, anything to mix things up and try and gain some sort of advantage in the series. Unfortunately, while the Heat’s starters are very talented, their talent is very thin after that. Popovich found ways to minimize any advantages the Heat may have had, and used his role players perfectly.

The importance of player development. Boris Diaw. Tiago Splitter. Kawhi Leonard. Players that aren’t great,2 and quite possibly wouldn’t be great on any other team. But fit them into a system where there’s passing and cutting – and which they follow with precision – and give the players both the opportunity (playing time) and skills (shooting coach extraordinaire), and you’ve got a perfect recipe for effective, impactful player development.3 This section could also be called: The importance of a solid, deep bench/aka perfectly suited role players.

The importance of an effective system. The precision with which the Spurs play is a thing of beauty. They get into their offense quickly (please take note of this, Coach Snyder), each player gets to his spot quickly, and the passes are perfectly precise. When you combine all of that with a very unselfish team - starting with superstar in Tim Duncan – you can essentially plug and play any number of the well-suited role players into the system and it still flows effortlessly. They still get buckets, and they still get defensive stops. The Spurs’ system makes average players look good, and good players look elite.

The importance of superstars. I think this series, just like so many Finals before, showed just how important it is to have a superstar, or multiple superstars, in order to compete for a championship. Both the Spurs and the Heat have three superstars capable of being a #1 guy on any team. 4 The other teams in the Conference Finals, Indiana and Oklahoma City, also had superstar players. Good, contending playoff teams have superstars; that’s just the way it is. But if you want to compete for a championship, you need a superstar.5

Each of these areas have to be encouraging for Jazz supporters; they’re examples of where the team can improve and has already taken steps in the right direction. So, fellow Jazz fans, what else would you add that’s encouraging about the Spurs’ win?

Laura Thompson

Laura Thompson

I grew up in California, but have been a Jazz fan pretty much since I was in diapers; I went to Karl Malone's basketball camp when I was 11 and I flew up to Utah in 1997 to go to Game 3 of the Finals. After graduating from BYU in 2008, I moved back to California to work in Marketing and have been doing that for the last five years. My favorite things in life are the Utah Jazz, basketball, food (whether cooking or consumption of), reading, church, black Labs, and the beach (though hopefully not in that order).
Laura Thompson
Laura Thompson

Latest posts by Laura Thompson (see all)

  • Examining Utah Jazz Shot Charts
    Analytics
    17
    July 25th, 2014

    Examining Utah Jazz Shot Charts

    In today’s media-savvy basketball world, there are a number of methods available to analysts like myself to evaluate players,...Read More

5 Comments

  1. ScotsJazzFanIn London says:

    What would I learn from San Antonio?

    Draft not on potential, not on best player available, draft on work ethic and a desired skillset that can be executed into the system going forward.

    Work to each players strengths, and give each player a role.

    Make each player earn every minute on the floor, not by sitting them on the bench and waiting their turn but demanding them perform certain tasks when on the floor. If the player does what is expected of him he earns further minutes on the floor. If he doesn’t no mater who he is, he get’s pulled.

    Preach the importance of the team’s result before individual stats at every opportunity.

  2. Brent says:

    Nice article. I’m excited too to see what DL and coach Snyder do for the development of our young players.
    Now about that superstar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    • Mewko says:

      Probably Noah Vonleh or Dante Exum is our star.
      Jabari Parker if it goes: Embiid, Exum, Wiggins, Smart, Parker.
      I’ve heard rumors that nobody can trade into the top 3, they’re asking too much.

  3. Clint Johnson says:

    Great insights, Laura. I’ve been thinking about your last point in regard to the Spurs a lot recently. Honestly, I don’t know if any of the Spurs players on THIS team are superstars. I’m debating with myself whether that is so or not. Tony Parker may be the closest to fit the definition, as he made All-NBA 2nd Team the last three seasons. But we’re talking about a guy who’s an 18-20 point scorer who throws in 7 assists. Does that qualify? Duncan absolutely was a superstar, but I don’t think he is now. Ginobili may never have been. Kawhi Leonard played great for three games, but I don’t even think he’s a star yet.

    The Spurs won because none of their guys played like a star; they all played their roles at a very high level. Honestly, the more I think about it, the more I see this Spurs team as similar to the Pistons championship team than the Heat or Celtics superteams built around stars. Just the way my recent contemplation has gone.

Leave a Reply